中外酒店论坛首页
  
中外酒店论坛网
  
 

中国饭店跨国经营的可行性及其战略选择

中国旅游学院院长 杜 江 博士

    随着中国"入世"进程的加速,中国旅游市场的全面开放已经成为不可逆转的趋势。在此情况下,包括饭店在内的中国的旅游企业如何有效地应对市场开放的挑战固然重要,因为这关系到民族旅游企业的生存与发展,但无论我们如何有效地应对挑战,只要外国旅游企业进入中国的旅游市场,就必然会对既有的市场进行不同程度的分割,从而造成中国旅游市场和旅游收益的净损失。中国旅游企业只有充分运用WTO确定的一系列有关服务贸易的规则,针对不同的市场采取不同形式的跨国经营,才能通过国际市场份额的增加,弥补国内市场和收益的损失,并不断提高中国旅游企业的国际竞争力,形成国际旅游分工与合作的良性态势。本文正是在这种跨国经营必要性假设的前提下,系统研究中国饭店跨国经营的可行性及其战略选择问题。 一、中国饭店的跨国经营的现实可行性
    中国饭店跨国经营的现实可行性集中体现在理论基础、经济基础、市场基础、产业基础、经验基础和政策基础几个方面。

1、中国饭店跨国经营的理论基础
    无论是刘易斯·威尔斯的小规模技术理论,还是约翰·邓宁的发展周期理论,都为发展中国家旅游企业的跨国经营提供了直接的理论依据。
    威尔斯将发展中国家对外直接投资的相对优势概括为拥有为小市场需要服务的小规模生产技术优势、发展中国家在民族产品的海外生产中的优势以及低价产品营销策略的优势。威尔斯的理论摒弃了那种只能依赖垄断的技术优势打入国际市场的传统观点,将发展中国家对外直接投资的竞争优势与这些国家自身的市场特征有机结合起来,从而为经济落后国家发展对外直接投资提供了理论依据。
    约翰·邓宁在总结经验的基础上提出的、已被实践证明是站得住脚的阶段性"发展周期理论"可以说已经为发展中国家饭店从事跨国经营,特别是从事较高级形式的跨国经营活动的可行性提供了直接的理论支持 。该理论认为:第一阶段,发展中国家在很低收入的水平下,很少甚至没有对外直接投资,本地公司也不具备对外投资所必要的竞争优势。第二阶段,经济虽有所发展,但由于本地企业没有创造出自己充分的所有权优势用于克服国外生产最初的障碍,因而不大可能有很多对外投资。然而,为了利用邻近地区的资源禀赋,或为了进入外国市场,可能进行有限度的跨国经营活动。第三阶段,也是大多数发展中国家目前正在经历的阶段,在它们的经济有了相当发展之后,它们可以采取一种以出口为导向参与国际分工的方针。这种分工只要能在创新活动中创造出有本国特色的所有权优势,就可能从贸易迈向生产。这样随着一些国家的发展,它们最终将进入第四阶段,这时它们将变成净对外投资者。

 

 

                 

Feasibilities And Strategic Choices
Of Transnational Operation for Chinese Hotels

Dujiang Ph.D. President of China Tourism University

As China is stepping up into WTO, the trend of thoroughly opening its tourist market becomes irreversible. Under this circumstance, how to effectively meet the challenges of the opening market is, without doubt, important for Chinese tourist enterprises including hotels, since it will affect their survival and growth. However, no matter how effectively we may rise to challenges, it will be inevitable for foreign businesses to acquire a certain share of the existing market once they enter China's tourist market, incurring a net loss of market share and revenue to native businesses. Only by following the set of rules of service trade prescribed by WTO, and by adopting various forms of multinational operation targeting at different markets, can Chinese tourist enterprises increase their share in international market so as to offset their loss in terms of domestic market share and revenue, and unceasingly enhance their ability to compete in international market, and form a favorable state of international division of labor and cooperation. The aim of this article is to systemically study the feasibilities and strategic choices for Chinese hotels to operate abroad under the assumption that it is highly necessary for them to do so.

I. The realistic feasibilities for Chinese hotels to operate abroad
This is mainly discussed in terms of theory, economy, market, industry, experience and government policies.
1. Theoretic basis for Chinese hotels to engage in transnational operation
Both Louis Wells' theory on small-scale technology and John Dunning's stages of development theory provide direct theoretical basis for the transnational operation of tourism enterprises from developing countries.
Wells has summarized the relative advantages of foreign direct investment(FDI) of developing countries. These advantages include the possession of small-scale production technology catering to the need of small markets, that of the advantage of manufacturing national products overseas, and of low-price marketing strategies. Wells abandons the traditional view that a business can only enter the international market by means of a monopoly of technology, and combines the market nature of the developing countries with their competitive superiority of FDI, thereby provides a theoretical basis for economically underdeveloped countries to make FDI.
Moreover, John Dunning's theory concerning the stages of development which proves to be reliable, provides a direct theoretical support for hotels from developing countries to engage in transnational operations, especially in higher forms of transnational operations(Chen Bao-sen, 2000). According to the theory, in the first stage of development, a developing country which remains in a state of very low income has little or no FDI, and local businesses do not have the competitive strengths needed to invest in foreign countries, either. In the second stage, the country's economy may have developed to some extent, but the local businesses have not created sufficient ownership strengths to overcome initial hindrances arising from overseas production, and therefore are unable to invest heavily abroad. Nevertheless, they may engage in limited transnational operations in order to make full use of the resource endowment of neighboring regions, or to make an entry into foreign markets. In the third stage, which accounts for the state of most of the developing countries, the economy of the countries has grown to such an extent that they are able to participate in international division of labor by means of an export-oriented trade. Once ownership strengths with unique local features are created through innovation, such a division of labor will evolve from trade to production. Finally, with further development of their economies, some countries will step into the fourth stage and become net foreign direct investors.

 

共6页 第1[2][3][4][5][6]
bottom